Not that I even really care, but the overall medal count strikes me as somewhat mis-representative of the true situation. Each country only has a limited population to draw upon for their team, shouldn’t this be considered?
Here’s the count, as of today: (I stopped at the NL, because I figured if they have more medals than you, you may as well just go home)
2008 Olympic Medal count sorted by total number of medals:
| Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total | Rank by medal count | |
| United States | 14 | 12 | 18 | 44 | 1 |
| China | 25 | 9 | 6 | 40 | 2 |
| Australia | 5 | 7 | 8 | 20 | 3 |
| Russia | 3 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 4 |
| France | 3 | 8 | 7 | 18 | 5 |
| South Korea | 6 | 8 | 3 | 17 | 6 |
| Italy | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 7 |
| Germany | 8 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
| Japan | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 9 |
| Cuba | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 10 |
| Great Britain | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Ukraine | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 13 |
And here’s how I think it should be:
2008 Olympic Medal count sorted by total number of medals / population:
| Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total | Rank by medal count | Population | (Medal count / population) * 10 million | |
| Cuba | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 10 | #N/A | #N/A |
| Ukraine | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 12 | #N/A | #N/A |
| Australia | 5 | 7 | 8 | 20 | 3 | 21388597 | 9.3508 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 16444382 | 4.2568 |
| South Korea | 6 | 8 | 3 | 17 | 6 | 48224000 | 3.5252 |
| France | 3 | 8 | 7 | 18 | 5 | 64473140 | 2.7919 |
| Italy | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 7 | 59619290 | 2.3482 |
| Germany | 8 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 8 | 82217800 | 1.7028 |
| United States | 14 | 12 | 18 | 44 | 1 | 304866000 | 1.4433 |
| Russia | 3 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 4 | 141888900 | 1.3391 |
| Great Britain | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 60587300 | 1.3204 |
| Japan | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 127690000 | 1.0181 |
| China | 25 | 9 | 6 | 40 | 2 | 1325525000 | 0.3018 |
…sorry Cuba and Ukrane, I couldn’t find your info.
Just in case the message here wasn’t clear, here’s a handy Gcal chart. I scaled the values by 10 million to make the numbers more aesthetically pleasing:
See how much more accurate this looks…?
Somehow, inexplicably, the Netherlands are coming second by this tally, which is so very wrong. I’m going to have to check/manipulate my calculations. Maybe the events for cheese-rolling, joint-smoking and red-light-districting have were all in the first few days.
I’m also working on factoring in a GDP component to the formula, but so far I’m not agreeing with how that looks.
Regardless, I think it’s abundantly clear that my home country is far and away the (presumptive) overall winner. I’m so inspired, I’m going to wear my new Australian flag beach towel (thanks mum) as a Cathy-Freeman-style cape this weekend.
DAve Abrahams
August 16th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
Brilliant, this has to be the subject of a T-shirt and bumper sticker campaign!
Australia the greatest Olympic Nation ever!*
Conditions apply:
……with the appropriate page of fine print to support the statement.
Fun stuff, with stats like this you could run for the next head of the Treasury.
Aussie Aussie A
Dave
Tim Brown
August 19th, 2008 at 8:52 pm
The populations of Ukraine and Cuba are:
Ukraine: 47,913,000
Cuba: 11,323,000
This puts Australia clearly in the lead, and leaves no question to the true veracity of your analysis!
Well done.
TB
Roger
August 20th, 2008 at 9:07 am
What about NZ?!
Ryan
August 20th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Ok NZ.
You have, as of today, 9 medals in total and a population of 4.1 million. This gives you a score (as per above) of 21.9
Australia, as of today, has 36 medals in total, which gives us an updated score of 16.9.
Doh.
The main thing however, is that the Netherlands still has only 13 medals and a population adjusted score of 4.3, so both NZ and AU are between 3 and 5 times better than the NL.
I’m going to factor in GDP and see how that looks.
Mr J
October 7th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
NZ isnt a country. Its just a povo provincial island off the coast of Nauru. Nobody cares.
Its full of Orcs and Hobbits.